[Rd] silly SVN question

[Ben Bolker]

  Yes, but ... on my system at least the Recommended folder has a recent
version of the Makefile, but the packages are old tarballs.  I have a
fuzzy memory that I needed to download the packages from somewhere else
to build a complete/up-to-date version, but I have forgotten where I
read that.  And
https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/src/library/Recommended/ shows that
only Makefile.in and Makefile.win live here.

  Does your  src/library/Recommended have up-to-date source code for all
the packages ... ?

 cheers
   Ben

Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote:
> The obvious: the recommended packages are inside
>   src/library
> 
> Kasper
> 
> On Dec 15, 2009, at 10:57 AM, Ben Bolker wrote:
> 
>>  I followed the suggestions at
>> http://developer.r-project.org/SVNtips.html to check out an anonymous
>> copy of the development branch of R, but so far I have been unable to
>> figure out an analogous way to track the development branch of the
>> recommended packages. (I'm assuming they actually live somewhere on the
>> same SVN server, which might not be true ...) Any ideas (including
>> pointing out the obvious, or the obvious-in-hindsight)?
>>
>>  thanks
>>    Ben Bolker
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
> 


-- 
Ben Bolker
Associate professor, Biology Dep't, Univ. of Florida
bolker at ufl.edu / people.biology.ufl.edu/bolker
GPG key: people.biology.ufl.edu/bolker/benbolker-publickey.asc

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/attachments/20091215/087b06eb/attachment.bin>