[Rd] power.t.test (PR#13891)
michaell at unimelb.edu.au
michaell at unimelb.edu.au
Fri Aug 14 01:35:14 CEST 2009
Full_Name: Michael J. Lew
Version: R version 2.9.1 (2009-06-26)
OS: OS X
Submission from: (NULL) (210.49.195.149)
The default function power.t.test gives inaccurate values, particularly with
large sig.level.
There are two reasons for me to propose that power.t.test is inaccurate:
1. When sig.level approaches 1, so should the power. However,
power.t.test('n'=5,'d'=1,'sig.level'=1) yields a power of 0.9430769. I've
compared it to the equivalent function in the 'pwr' package, pwr.t.test, and
while power.t.test gives a smooth function with respect to sig.level, it
deivates systematically more and more as sig.level is increased.
pwr.t.test('n'=5,'d'=1,'sig.level'=1) gives the correct power of 1.
2. I've run empirical simulations and found that the power predicted by
pwr.t.test is correct and so it is clear that power.t.test is inaccurate.
More information about the R-devel
mailing list