[Rd] Inconsistent documentation in Writing R Extensions (PR#13878)

[ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk]

On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Brandon.J.Whitcher at gsk.com wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> I think there is an inconsistency in the Writing R Extensions document.
> Please let me know if I am right or wrong on this one.
>
> Working from the PDF document (R-exts-2.9.1.pdf)
>
>  - page 9 states that the file <pkg>-Ex.Rout.save should be placed in
> tests/Examples in order to check against the current set of examples.
>  - page 17 (item 16) states that the file <pkg>-Ex-Rout.save should be
> placed in tests/Examples.
>
> I have checked in one of my packages, and I believe the first case
> <pkg>-Ex.Rout.save is correct.  Is this true?

Yes.
>
> cheers...
>
> Brandon
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This e-mail was sent by GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited
> (registered in England and Wales No. 1047315), which is a
> member of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. The
> registered address of GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited
> is 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex TW8 9GS.
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> 	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>

-- 
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595