[Rd] summary for negative binomial GLMs (PR#13640)
bolker at ufl.edu
Mon Apr 6 20:21:38 CEST 2009
<kushler <at> oakland.edu> writes:
> Full_Name: Robert Kushler
> Version: 2.7.2
> OS: Windows XP
> Submission from: (NULL) (126.96.36.199)
> I believe that the negative binomial family (from MASS) should be
> added to the
> list for which dispersion is set to 1.
Could you please clarify? In what procedures, under what
circumstances? Sounds like you mean l. 573 of glm.R:
if(object$family$family %in% c("poisson", "binomial")) 1
The use case here is using negative.binomial with a fixed
theta parameter, right? Using glm.nb takes care of this problem
(it produces an object of class "negbin": MASS:::summary.negbin
shows that the dispersion gets set to 1 here).
I guess there's a little bit of a jurisdictional
argument here, since the negative.binomial family is
in MASS, and summary.glm is in base R ... also, there's
a bit of a challenge in figuring out the test, because
object$family$family is not a fixed string for negative
binomial-family objects (e.g. "Negative Binomial(0.4)"
in the example below) -- I'm not sure of the cleanest
way to detect this case.
I think I agree with you, but it would help to present
your case in more detail ...
x <- rep(seq(0,23,by=1),50)
s <- rep(seq(1,2,length=50*24),1)
tmp2 <- data.frame(y=rnbinom(length(s),
mu=8*(sin(2*pi*x/24)+2),size = 0.4),x=factor(x),s=s)
tmp.glm.nb2 <- glm.nb(y~factor(x)-1 +offset(log(s)),data = tmp2)
## summary.negbin takes care of this case
tmp.glm.nb3 <- glm(y~factor(x)-1 +offset(log(s)),data = tmp2,
More information about the R-devel