[Rd] Package install problem on Windows (PR#13284)

Prof Brian Ripley ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Fri Nov 14 09:04:10 CET 2008


On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Simon Urbanek wrote:

> On Nov 13, 2008, at 6:11 PM, Tony Plate wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the response.
>> 
>> Are the problems with versioned installs fundamental, or are they just a 
>> case of incomplete implementation and rough edges?
>> If the latter, would fixes be considered?
>> 
>> I ask because we would find versioned installs very useful in maintaining 
>> stable production systems, each of which might run with different versions 
>> of various packages, while making it easy to continually develop and refine 
>> our packages.  As a point of info, our primary use for versioning would be 
>> with our own packages, so we could probably get away without using 
>> versioned installs for base or contributed packages.
>> 
>
> I find it more useful to work with multiple library paths (.libPaths()) than 
> versioning packages in the above scenario. We usually maintain "stable" 
> package library which is individually overridden by additional paths added by 
> the user (e.g. developer library for testing) and/or subsystems. The override 
> can also be revertive, i.e. a subsystem is free to use older packages in its 
> library than the stable library when desired.

So do I.  If you have versioned installs, the highest version will be 
chosen unless you specify otherwise, and there is no way to specify a 
version in common mechanisms like Depends:, Imports: in the DESCRIPTION 
file and imports()/importsFrom() in the namespace.  Even if a package uses 
requires(), you can only specify a particular version, not a range of 
versions.  So using different library trees is a much more general 
mechanism.

As far as I understand, the main point of versioned installs was to be 
able to load different versions of a package in the same R session, so 
packages A and B could depend on different versions of package C.  As 
namespaces are not versioned, this cannot be done with packages with 
namespaces (there are other issues too).  We've known that for a long 
time, and no one has been motivated to fix it (and it would need extensive 
changes).  It is way beyond anything we would accept non-R-core patches 
for.

It would be possible to fix up the lack of implementation of versioned 
installs on Windows (which are much more extensive than in this bug 
report).  But given that the lack has been there for several years and no 
user seems to have noticed it, it seems a waste of effort to do so.  The 
plan is to move INSTALL on both Unix and Windows to a common R script, and 
that is unlikely to support versioned installs.

There are on-going discussions in R-core, but the likely outcome is to 
deprecate versioned installs in the near future.

>
> Cheers,
> S
>
>
>> However, if the problems with versioned installs are not amenable to the 
>> kinds of fixes that users can contribute, then I guess we should look for a 
>> different approach.
>> 
>> Suggestions and comments are welcome!  Do many people use versioned 
>> installs?
>> 
>> -- Tony Plate (coworker of Lars @ blackmesacapital.com)
>> 
>> Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>>> Installing versioned packages is not supported with namespaces.  I have 
>>> suggested from time to time that versioned installs be removed because of 
>>> this and other known issues, and recommend that you do not attempt to use 
>>> them.
>>> 
>>> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, lhansen at blackmesacapital.com wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Full_Name: Lars Hansen
>>>> Version: 2.8.0
>>>> OS: Windows XP Pro x64 SP2
>>>> Submission from: (NULL) (71.39.177.36)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I have run into a problem using "R CMD INSTALL" with the
>>>> "--with-package-versions" option under Windows. It is a bit obscure, 
>>>> which could
>>>> explain why other people have not run into it.
>>>> 
>>>> We happen to have two packages with almost the same name. One name is a 
>>>> subset
>>>> of the other. The names are "RtTests" and "RtTestsEG1".  I have no 
>>>> problem
>>>> installing "RtTests" and many other packages, but run into problems 
>>>> installing
>>>> "RtTestsEG1". The "RtTestsEG1" package happens to be a simple example of 
>>>> how to
>>>> use the "RtTests" package, so it depends on "RtTests" (which is probably 
>>>> the
>>>> problem).
>>>> 
>>>> OK, so this is what happens when I attempt to install "RtTestsEG1":
>>>> 
>>>> $ R CMD INSTALL --with-package-versions --library=$R_LIBS RtTestsEG1
>>>> 
>>>> installing RtTestsEG1 package
>>>> 
>>>> ---------- Making package RtTestsEG1 ------------
>>>> adding build stamp to DESCRIPTION
>>>> installing R files
>>>> preparing package RtTestsEG1 for lazy loading
>>>> Loading required package: RtTests
>>>> ... [lost of lines removed]
>>>> Loading required package: RtTests
>>>> Error: evaluation nested too deeply: infinite recursion /
>>>> options(expressions=)?
>>>> Execution halted
>>>> make[2]: *** [lazyload] Error 1
>>>> make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
>>>> make: *** [pkg-RtTestsEG1] Error 2
>>>> *** Installation of RtTestsEG1 failed ***
>>>> 
>>>> After some digging in the Windows makefiles, I found out that changing 
>>>> the
>>>> locale from "C" to "us" in the "lazyload" target of
>>>> $R_HOME/src/gnuwin32/MakePkg, i.e. using "LC_ALL=us" instead of 
>>>> "LC_ALL=C",
>>>> solves the infinite recursion problem and give an useful message. It 
>>>> still fails
>>>> but now says:
>>>> 
>>>> Loading required package: RtTests
>>>> Warning: S3 methods 'summary.RtTestSetResults', 'print.RtTestSetResults',
>>>> 'print.RtTestSetResults.summary' were declared in NAMESPACE but not found
>>>> Error in namespaceExport(ns, exports) :
>>>> undefined exports: parseTranscriptFile, compareTranscriptAndOutput
>>>> Error: package 'RtTests' could not be loaded
>>>> Execution halted
>>>> 
>>>> It is true that RtTests declares the various functions in its name space, 
>>>> but
>>>> why can they suddenly not be found? If I load RtTests by itself, i.e.
>>>> library(RtTests), there is no problem.
>>>> 
>>>> I happen to have all this working under Linux, so I tracked down the 
>>>> difference.
>>>> Turns out that under Linux the equivalent to the "lazyload" target is in
>>>> "/usr/lib/R/bin/INSTALL" and the difference is in the argument passed to
>>>> "tools:::makeLazyLoading". Under Linux the full package name with version 
>>>> number
>>>> is used, i.e. "RtTests_0.1-1". Windows just uses "RtTests".
>>>> 
>>>> So I managed to fix the problem by making Windows use the full package 
>>>> name in
>>>> the "lazyload" target. I replaced
>>>> tools:::makeLazyLoading(\"$(PKG)\"
>>>> with
>>>> tools:::makeLazyLoading(\"$(notdir $(DPKG))\"
>>>> 
>>>> If I now reinstall "RtTests", I can finally install "RtTestsEG1".
>>>> 
>>>> I must confess, that I do not fully understand exactly what it takes to
>>>> reproduce this problem. I am guessing that all it takes is a package 
>>>> depending
>>>> on a versioned package. Maybe the similarity in names introduces a 
>>>> problem
>>>> because of partial matching. I am guessing that has nothing to do with 
>>>> it.
>>>> 
>>>> To sum up the report. I see two problems:
>>>> 
>>>> 1) LC_ALL=C causes infinite recursion. It is as if the C locale does not 
>>>> work
>>>> under Windows. I do not know what the fix is. It is used many places in 
>>>> install
>>>> scripts and makefiles. Fixing it in the "lazyload" target is not enough. 
>>>> Even
>>>> with my change I still get "infinite recursion" and no error message if I 
>>>> try to
>>>> install "RtTestsEG1" without first installing "RtTests".
>>>> 
>>>> 2) "makeLazyLoading()" in "lazyload" target needs to be called with full 
>>>> package
>>>> name with embedded version number. I think this is bug under Windows and 
>>>> my fix
>>>> takes care of it.
>>>> 
>>>> It took some time to figure this out. I am hoping this report will save 
>>>> other
>>>> people time. I am note sure if I succeeded in describing the problem 
>>>> clearly.
>>>> Please do not hesitate to ask for clarification.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Lars Hansen
>>>> 
>>>> P.S.
>>>>> sessionInfo()
>>>> R version 2.8.0 Patched (2008-10-22 r46776)
>>>> i386-pc-mingw32
>>>> 
>>>> locale:
>>>> LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252;LC_CTYPE=English_United
>>>> States.1252;LC_MONETARY=English_United
>>>> States.1252;LC_NUMERIC=C;LC_TIME=English_United States.1252
>>>> 
>>>> attached base packages:
>>>> [1] stats     graphics  grDevices utils     datasets  methods   base
>>>> 
>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>> 
>> 
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

-- 
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595



More information about the R-devel mailing list