[Rd] Routine and Deep testing with R CMD check
Bill Dunlap
bill at insightful.com
Wed Jun 11 19:45:05 CEST 2008
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> Bill Dunlap wrote:
> > It might be nice if check could print the time it took to do
> > each test.
>
> That's an existing request for various parts of the checking procedure.
> When the time to run a package check jumps up, it is sometimes tedious to
> find out where the time went. But the tests are currently scripted by
> make, so difficult to produce timings portably.
In Splus, if you set options(verbose=TRUE), then the time
for each top level expression is printed to stdout (or
to a log file, depending on other options). The Time:
line tells which top level expression it refers to and
whether the expression succeeded or failed. E.g.,
> options(verbose=TRUE)
Time: Task #2 succeeded (Seconds = 0.01 CPU, 0.01 elapsed)
> for(i in 1:1e5)log(i)
Time: Task #3 succeeded (Seconds = 1.49 CPU, 1.5 elapsed)
> for(i in 1:1e5) if (i==1e5) stop("i is too big") else log(i)
Error: Problem: i is too big
Problem: i is too big
Use traceback() to see the call stack
Time: Task #4 failed (Seconds = 3.18 CPU, 3.2 elapsed)
If R had this sort of logging then check could turn it on
when desired.
Splus also uses this logging mechanism to log calls to
read.table() and inputData(), to record the initial
value of .Random.seed, etc., so one can run a perl script
over the log file for a batch run to see if there were
significant problems and have enough information to
reproduce the problems found.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Dunlap
Insightful Corporation
bill at insightful dot com
"All statements in this message represent the opinions of the author and do
not necessarily reflect Insightful Corporation policy or position."
More information about the R-devel
mailing list