[Rd] get ...
Duncan Murdoch
murdoch at stats.uwo.ca
Wed Jul 2 02:29:06 CEST 2008
On 30/06/2008 10:56 AM, Luke Tierney wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
>
>> Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>>> Suppose we do this:
>>>
>>>
>>>> f <- function(...) environment()
>>>> e <- f(a = 1, b = 2)
>>>> ls(e, all = TRUE)
>>>>
>>> [1] "..."
>>>
>>>> e$...
>>>>
>>> <...>
>>>
>>>> class(e$...)
>>>>
>>> [1] "..."
>>>
>>> Is there any way of getting a and b given e without
>>> modifying f?
>>>
>>> evalq(list(...),e)
>> $a
>> [1] 1
>>
>> $b
>> [1] 2
>>
>>
>
> I'm wondering though whether we should allow the internal DOTSXP value
> of "..." to escape to the user level. Might be more appropriate for
> get(e,"..."), e$... (and as.list.environment and maybe a few other
> things) to give the "Error: '...' used in an incorrect context" error
> if the value is a DOTSXP.
On the other hand, what Gabor sees in e is what he would see inside f:
> f <- function(...) { ls(all=T) }
> f(a=1, b=2)
[1] "..."
I don't think we should distinguish between user level in .GlobalEnv and
what a user sees inside a function he writes. Stopping a user from
seeing ... inside a function would break all sorts of things.
Duncan Murdoch
More information about the R-devel
mailing list