[Rd] RFC: What should ?foo do?
P.Dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk
Fri Apr 25 14:46:16 CEST 2008
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> I haven't done it, but I suspect we could introduce special behaviour
> for ??foo very easily. We could even have a whole hierarchy:
> ?foo, ??foo, ???foo, ????foo, ...
Heh, that's rather nice, actually. In words, that could read
?foo: tell me about foo!
??foo: what can you tell me about foo?
???foo: what can you tell me about things like foo?
????foo: I don't know what I'm looking for but it might be something
You do have to be careful about messing with ?, though. I think many
people, including me, would pretty quickly go nuts if ?par suddenly
didn't work the way we're used to.
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Øster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
More information about the R-devel