[Rd] suggested minor patch for optim.R
Thomas Petzoldt
Thomas.Petzoldt at TU-Dresden.de
Sat Apr 5 12:16:57 CEST 2008
Ben Bolker wrote:
> optim ignores misspelled control parameters, so that trying
> to set (e.g.) "maxint=1000" in the control argument silently
> does nothing. The patch below (watch out for line breaks! also
> posted at http://www.zoo.ufl.edu/bolker/optim_patch.R , and
> http://www.zoo.ufl.edu/bolker/optim_new.R) adds
> three lines to optim.R that issue a warning if any names of
> elements of "control" fail to match the internal object that
> contains the defaults.
>
> Here is code that shows the behavior:
[... details deleted]
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2008-March/048710.html
Ben,
another issue of optim is that I don't see any reason why the REPORT
control parameter is evaluated by "BFGS" and "L-BFGS-B" only but not,
for example, by "SANN", see:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2008-March/048710.html
Thomas P.
More information about the R-devel
mailing list