[Rd] codetools really optional for R CMD check?
edd at debian.org
Thu Jul 26 00:20:42 CEST 2007
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 01:29:24PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> After upgrading to R 2.5.1 on Debian, R CMD check gives
> * checking Rd cross-references ... WARNING
> Error in .find.package(package, lib.loc) :
> there is no package called 'codetools'
> Execution halted
> * checking for missing documentation entries ... WARNING
> The NEWS file says (for 2.5.0; I was on 2.4 before the recent upgrade)
> o New recommended package 'codetools' by Luke Tierney provides
> code-analysis tools. This can optionally be used by 'R CMD
> check' to detect problems, especially symbols which are not
> This sounds as if R CMD check should run OK without the package, and it
> doesn't seem to.
> Have I misunderstood something, or is their a problem with R CMD check's
> handling of the case with missing codetools.
> I don't have codetools installed because the Debian r-recommended
> package was missing a dependency; I see that's already been fixed
Yes, there was a transition problem. When R 2.5.0 was released, I was
unaware of the need to prepare packages for codetools and rcompgen
__early enough so that they would migrate through the NEW queue in
Debian__ and hence be available upon the day of the R release.
Otherwise a Depends is no good if it can't be fulfilled.
So yes, for a while we had an implied Depends, but nothing formal. All
this has now been rectified and installing or upgrading r-recommended
will get you the new packages as it should.
Prior to another R releases with new recommended packages, I should
either pay closer attention to the relevant subdirectory in the
sources, and hope for a friendly heads-up from R Core (hint, ...)
Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions.
More information about the R-devel