[Rd] formula(CO2)
(Ted Harding)
ted.harding at nessie.mcc.ac.uk
Mon Jul 16 16:14:40 CEST 2007
On 16-Jul-07 13:57:56, Ted Harding wrote:
> On 16-Jul-07 13:28:50, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>> The formula attribute of the builtin CO2 dataset seems a bit strange:
>>
>>> formula(CO2)
>> Plant ~ Type + Treatment + conc + uptake
>>
>> What is one supposed to do with that? Certainly its not suitable
>> for input to lm and none of the examples in ?CO2 use the above.
>
> I think one is supposed to ignore it! (Or maybe be inspired to
> write a mail to the list ... ).
>
> I couldn't find anything that looked like the above formula from
> str(CO2). But I did spot that the order of terms in the formula:
> Plant, Type, treatment, conc, uptake, is the same as the order
> of the "columns" in the dataframe.
>
> So I tried:
>
> D<-data.frame(x=(1:10),y=(1:10))
>
> formula(D)
> x ~ y
>
> So, lo and behold, D has a formula!
>
> Or does it? Maybe if you give formula() a dataframe, it simply
> constructs one from the "columns".
Now that I think about it, I can see a use for this phenomenon:
> formula(CO2)
Plant ~ Type + Treatment + conc + uptake
> formula(CO2[,2:5])
Type ~ Treatment + conc + uptake
> formula(CO2[,3:5])
Treatment ~ conc + uptake
> formula(CO2[,4:5])
conc ~ uptake
> formula(CO2[,c(5,1,2,3,4)])
uptake ~ Plant + Type + Treatment + conc
Could save a lot of typing!
Best wishes,
Ted.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <ted.harding at nessie.mcc.ac.uk>
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 16-Jul-07 Time: 15:14:38
------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------
More information about the R-devel
mailing list