[Rd] colnames is slow for data.frames with implicit row.names
mtmorgan at fhcrc.org
Wed Sep 27 15:45:32 CEST 2006
Yes, obviously, with hindsight. In lieu of code change, the colnames
documentation could indicate the restricted sense of 'equivalent'.
For a data frame, 'rownames' and 'colnames' are equivalent to
'row.names' and 'names' respectively.
It might help to add 'names' to See Also of ?data.frame.
Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk> writes:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Martin Morgan wrote:
>> colnames on a data.frame with implicit row.names
>>> df <- data.frame(x=1:6000000)
>> is slow
>>  21.655 0.327 21.987 0.000 0.000
>>  0 0 0 0 0
>> because colnames calls dimnames calls row.names.data.frame calls
>> as.character on the implicit row.names.
> So use names() and not colnames():
> rownames and colnames for matrices
> row.names and names for data frames.
> All colnames assumes is that there is a dimnames method: this could be
> relevant for objects inheriting from "data.frame", but there is a
> price for generality.
> Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
> Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
> University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
> 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
> Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
Martin T. Morgan
Bioconductor / Computational Biology
More information about the R-devel