[Rd] Sweave processes \Sexpr in commented LaTeX source (2.3.1patched and 2.4.0)

Friedrich Leisch friedrich.leisch at stat.uni-muenchen.de
Wed Sep 20 08:43:31 CEST 2006

>>>>> On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:14:39 -0500,
>>>>> Marc Schwartz (MS) wrote:

  > Hi all,
  > On FC5, using:

  >   Version 2.3.1 Patched (2006-08-06 r38829)

  > and today's

  >   R version 2.4.0 alpha (2006-09-19 r39397)

  > with the following .Rnw file:

  > \documentclass[10pt]{article}
  > \begin{document}

  >    This line should print '2': \Sexpr{1 + 1}
  > %% This line should NOT print '2': \Sexpr{1 + 1}

  > \end{document}

  > The \Sexpr in the second line is processed even though the line is
  > commented. This results in the following .tex file content (in the case
  > of R 2.4.0):

  > \documentclass[10pt]{article}
  > \usepackage{/home/marcs/R.Files/SourceCode/R-alpha/share/texmf/Sweave}
  > \begin{document}

  >    This line should print '2': 2
  > %% This line should NOT print '2': 2

  > \end{document}

  > Shouldn't Sweave just generally ignore commented LaTeX code? In
  > reviewing Sweave.R I did not see a check for this, so perhaps there are
  > circumstances where one wants a \Sexpr in commented LaTeX code
  > processed. An example escapes me at the moment however.

Sweave does not parse the LaTeX part of the document at all (which
makes it a lot easier), all it does is looking for its own "magic
strings" and replacing those, wherever they might occur.

If we would start to respect comments, we would need a some kind of
parser for LaTeX, which we currently don't need ... and starting to
parse LaTeX would also open a can of worms of possible requests (what
to do with Sexpr inside verbatim, etc, etc).


More information about the R-devel mailing list