[Rd] invert argument in grep

[Duncan Murdoch]

On 11/10/2006 12:52 PM, Romain Francois wrote:
> Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>> On 11/9/2006 5:14 AM, Romain Francois wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> What about an `invert` argument in grep, to return elements that are 
>>> *not* matching a regular expression :
>>>
>>> R> grep("pink", colors(), invert = TRUE, value = TRUE)
>>>
>>> would essentially return the same as :
>>>
>>> R> colors() [ - grep("pink", colors()) ]
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm attaching the files that I modified (against today's tarball) for 
>>> that purpose.
>>
>> I think a more generally useful change would be to be able to return a 
>> logical vector with TRUE for a match and FALSE for a non-match, so a 
>> simple !grep(...) does the inversion.  (This is motivated by the 
>> recent R-help discussion of the fact that x[-selection] doesn't always 
>> invert the selection when it's a vector of indices.)
>>
>> A way to do that without expanding the argument list would be to allow
>>
>> value="logical"
>>
>> as well as value=TRUE and value=FALSE.
>>
>> This would make boolean operations easy, e.g.
>>
>> colors()[grep("dark", colors(), value="logical")
>>       & !grep("blue", colors(), value="logical")]
>>
>> to select the colors that contain "dark" but not "blue". (In this case 
>> the RE to select that subset is rather simple because "dark" always 
>> precedes "blue", but if that wasn't true, it would be a lot messier.)
>>
>> Duncan Murdoch
> Hi,
> 
> It sounds like a nice thing to have. I would still prefer to type :
> 
> R> grep ( "dark", grep("blue", colors(), value = TRUE, invert=TRUE), 
> value = TRUE )  

That's good for intersecting two searches, but not for other boolean 
combinations.

My main point was that inversion isn't the only boolean operation you 
may want, but R has perfectly good powerful boolean operators, so 
installing a limited subset of boolean algebra into grep() is probably 
the wrong approach.
> 
> 
> What about a way to pass more than one regular expression then be able 
> to call :
> 
> R> grep( c("dark", "blue"), colors(), value = TRUE, invert = c(TRUE, FALSE)

Again, it covers & and !, but it misses other boolean operators.

> I usually use that kind of shortcuts that are easy to remember.
> 
> vgrep <- function(...) grep(..., value = TRUE)
> igrep <- function(...) grep(..., invert = TRUE)
> ivgrep <- vigrep <- function(...) grep(..., invert = TRUE, value = TRUE)

If you're willing to write these, then it's easy to write igrep without 
an invert arg to grep:

igrep <- function(pat, x, ...)
    setdiff(1:length(x), grep(pat, x, value = FALSE, ...))

ivgrep would also be easy, except for the weird semantics of value=TRUE 
pointed out by Brian:  but it could still be written with a little bit 
of care.

Duncan Murdoch

> 
> What about things like the arguments `after` and `before` in unix grep. 
> That could be used when grepping inside a function :
> 
> R> grep("plot\\.", body(plot.default) , value= TRUE)
> [1] "localWindow <- function(..., col, bg, pch, cex, lty, lwd) 
> plot.window(...)"
> [2] "plot.new()"
> [3] "plot.xy(xy, type, ...)"
> 
> 
> when this could be useful  (possibly).
> 
> R> # grep("plot\\.", plot.default, after = 2, value = TRUE)
> R> tmp <- tempfile(); sink(tmp) ; print(body(plot.default)); sink(); 
> system( paste( "grep -A2 plot\\. ", tmp) )
>     localWindow <- function(..., col, bg, pch, cex, lty, lwd) 
> plot.window(...)
>     localTitle <- function(..., col, bg, pch, cex, lty, lwd) title(...)
>     xlabel <- if (!missing(x))
> --
>     plot.new()
>     localWindow(xlim, ylim, log, asp, ...)
>     panel.first
>     plot.xy(xy, type, ...)
>     panel.last
>     if (axes) {
> --
>     if (frame.plot)
>         localBox(...)
>     if (ann)
> 
> 
> BTW, if I call :
> 
> R> grep("plot\\.", plot.default)
> Error in as.character(x) : cannot coerce to vector
> 
> What about adding that line at the beginning of grep, or something else 
> to be able to do as.character on a function ?
> 
> if(is.function(x)) x <- body(x)
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Romain
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Romain
> 
>