[Rd] Test for argument in ...
Gregor Gorjanc
gregor.gorjanc at gmail.com
Sun Jul 2 22:21:48 CEST 2006
Bill Dunlap wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Gregor Gorjanc wrote:
>
>> Yes, this works.
>>
>> Thanks Gabor!
>>
>> Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>>> That's because you are passing the argument twice. Try this:
>>>
>>>> foo1 <- function(x, ...)
>>> + {
>>> + L <- list(...)
>>> + if (is.null(L$decreasing)) L$decreasing <- TRUE
>>> + do.call(order, c(list(x), L))
>>> + }
>>>> foo1(c(5, 2, 3, 4), decreasing=FALSE)
>>> [1] 2 3 4 1
>
> How does this differ from
> foo2 <- function(x, ..., decreasing=TRUE)
> order(x, ..., decreasing = decreasing)
> ?
I agree, but I wanted to learn ... argument in a more general way. That
was just an example - not a good one as you have showed.
>> x<-c(5,2,3,4)
>> identical(foo2(x), foo1(x))
> [1] TRUE
>> identical(foo2(x,decreasing=F), foo1(x,decreasing=F))
> [1] TRUE
>> identical(foo2(x,decreasing=T), foo1(x,decreasing=T))
> [1] TRUE
--
Lep pozdrav / With regards,
Gregor Gorjanc
----------------------------------------------------------------------
University of Ljubljana PhD student
Biotechnical Faculty
Zootechnical Department URI: http://www.bfro.uni-lj.si/MR/ggorjan
Groblje 3 mail: gregor.gorjanc <at> bfro.uni-lj.si
SI-1230 Domzale tel: +386 (0)1 72 17 861
Slovenia, Europe fax: +386 (0)1 72 17 888
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"One must learn by doing the thing; for though you think you know it,
you have no certainty until you try." Sophocles ~ 450 B.C.
More information about the R-devel
mailing list