[Rd] Your false remark on PR#1654
ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Sat Jan 28 08:29:36 CET 2006
The comment says
`Works in 2.3.0: BDR fixed inline [xy]axp'
and 2.2.1 is not 2.3.0.
Your example is not reproducible, so we cannot check. If you get a copy
of R-devel (as the FAQ and posting guide ask you to before posting) you
can check for yourself.
Please do study the FAQ and avoid time-wasting.
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 cain at u.washington.edu wrote:
> Full_Name: Kevin Cain
> Version: 2.2.1
> OS: Windows XP
> Submission from: (NULL) (128.95.124.144)
>
>
> In the following command, R ignores the xaxp command - it places tick marks at
> 1, 1.5, 2.0, etc regardless of what the third argument is (I want them only at
> integer values).
>
> plot(x=c(min(time),max(time)),y=c(min(y-se),max(y+se)),type='n',xaxp=c(1,4,3),
> xlab='Measurement Time Point',
> ylab='Accelerometer Mean VMU/min')
>
> A prior bug report says this problem has been fixed (Graphics-fixed/1654), but
> it looks like that referred to the unix version.
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
>
--
Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
More information about the R-devel
mailing list