[Rd] standardized residuals (rstandard & plot.lm) (PR#8468)
d.firth@warwick.ac.uk
d.firth at warwick.ac.uk
Wed Jan 11 12:56:56 CET 2006
On 10 Jan, 2006, at 14:58, maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch wrote:
>>>>>> "Heather" == Heather Turner <Heather.Turner at warwick.ac.uk>
>>>>>> on Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:30:23 +0100 (CET) writes:
>
> Heather> This bug is not quite fixed - the example from my
> Heather> original report now = works using R-2.2.1, but
>
> Heather> plot(Uniform, 6)
>
> Heather> does not. The bug is due
>
> .........
> g <- hatval/(1 - hatval) # Potential division by zero here
>
> plot(g, cook, xlim = c(0, max(g)), ylim = c(0, ymx),
> ..........
>
> Heather> All other values of 'which' seem to work
> Heather> fine. Sorry not to have checked this in the beta
> Heather> version,
>
> (indeed; that would have been useful)
>
>
> Hmm, it's not clear what *should* be drawn in such a
> case. Leaving away all the observations with h_ii = 1
> seems a particularly bad idea, since these are the ones that
> you'd definitely should remark.
> OTOH, for h_ii = 1, the cook distance is 'NaN'
> (or should that be changed; to "very large" instead ???)
> and plot number 6 doesn't seem to make any sense to me
>
> When 'which = 6' was proposed
> [ on R-devel as well, last April,
> http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/devel/05/04/0595.html
> ah, I see, by David Firth, from your place, so, Heather, can you
> make sure he sees this e-mail ?
> ]
> I actually had wondered a bit about it's general usefulness,..
Yes, I remember that there was some discussion of this last year, and
my recollection is that it was mostly luke-warm at best in regard to
including this plot.
The "h_ii = 1" problem can of course be taken care of by leaving out
such points if they can be reliably detected, but I share Martin's
unease about this. We should also worry about for example h_ii = (1 -
epsilon), with epsilon small, as plotting such a point would
effectively make the rest of the graph useless.
Maybe it would be safest to remove the which=6 option?
David
More information about the R-devel
mailing list