[Rd] apropos changes in r-devel: intended feature or bug?
luke at stat.uiowa.edu
Fri Dec 22 14:08:44 CET 2006
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Kurt Hornik wrote:
>>>>>> Martin Maechler writes:
>>>>>> "DeepS" == Deepayan Sarkar <deepayan.sarkar at gmail.com>
>>>>>> on Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:07:27 -0800 writes:
> DeepS> The old apropos started with: if
> DeepS> (!is.character(what)) what <-
> DeepS> as.character(substitute(what))
> DeepS> The new one has:
> DeepS> if (character.only) stopifnot(is.character(what))
> DeepS> else what <- as.character(substitute(what))
> DeepS> i.e., the check for is.character(what) is
> DeepS> missing. This has the effect that 'what' can no
> DeepS> longer be a character string generated by a function
> DeepS> call unless 'character.only = TRUE'. I don't think
> DeepS> this was intended; the change makes previously valid
> DeepS> use invalid and I can't think of a situation where it
> DeepS> is useful.
>> [ Did you read the corresponding NEWS entry? ]
>> It now parallelizes the use in library() , require() etc,
>> and in particular does what the documentation says it does!
>> The old behavior was much less consistent and not according to
>> apropos(lm) was equivalent to apropos("lm")
>> but apropos(fit) gave an error.
> I would actually prefer if we only had standard evaluation for apropos()
> and find().
> (I understand we cannot do this for library() and help().)
I agree completely. If it is OK to make changes that make previous
usage fail then it would be better to go to standard evaluation and
let apropos(lm) fail.
Chair, Statistics and Actuarial Science
Ralph E. Wareham Professor of Mathematical Sciences
University of Iowa Phone: 319-335-3386
Department of Statistics and Fax: 319-335-3017
241 Schaeffer Hall email: luke at stat.uiowa.edu
Iowa City, IA 52242 WWW: http://www.stat.uiowa.edu
More information about the R-devel