[Rd] sort() generic? [Re: Suspicious behaviour of sort on POSIXct ..]
Dannenberg, Alex
Alex.Dannenberg at GEODECAPITAL.COM
Thu Aug 10 18:52:10 CEST 2006
With all due respect, I don't think that the change to the sort function is "a good change". New versions should be backward compatible whenever possible, i.e. unless there's a very compelling reason to force large amounts of old code to break. In this case, the sort function could have had an additional "unclass" argument with a default value of FALSE. That way, old code wouldn't break and new code could be written with unclass set to TRUE for speed. I hope this will be the case for 2.3.4
_______________________________
Alexander Dannenberg
Geode Capital Management, LLC
53 State Street . Boston . MA . 02109
Tel 617.392.8123 Cell 617.372.6805
alex.dannenberg at geodecapital.com
This e-mail, and any attachments hereto, are intended for us...{{dropped}}
More information about the R-devel
mailing list