[Rd] looks in liblapack.a not liblapack.so

[Tom 'spot' Callaway]

On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 10:36 +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:

> Probably because it is discussed in the R-admin manual as having 
> previously appeared in Debian and being traced to an erroneous patch to 
> the Lapack 3.0 sources.

You wouldn't happen to have more specific details on this, would you? :)

I know there is a fair amount of cruft in the Fedora lapack package, and
I'd like to clean it out, but I want to make sure I don't remove any
legitimate bug-fixes in the process.

(See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169399 for
some semi-related discussion of lapack and its patching)

Thanks,

~spot
-- 
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!