[Rd] plot, spineplot, boxplot in R 2.2.0

[Gabor Grothendieck]

I agree that I was mixing up the two issues.

On 9/24/05, John Fox <jfox at mcmaster.ca> wrote:
> Dear Gabor,
>
> This behaviour makes sense to me, since in the first case the response is
> quantitative and the explanatory variable a factor (hence, parallel
> boxplots), while in the second it's vice-versa (hence parallel stacked
> bars). That is, the primary distinction, I think, isn't the orientation of
> the axes but the nature of the variables.
>
> Regards,
>  John
>
> --------------------------------
> John Fox
> Department of Sociology
> McMaster University
> Hamilton, Ontario
> Canada L8S 4M4
> 905-525-9140x23604
> http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/jfox
> --------------------------------
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: r-devel-bounces at r-project.org
> > [mailto:r-devel-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Gabor Grothendieck
> > Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 10:49 AM
> > To: R-devel
> > Subject: [Rd] plot, spineplot, boxplot in R 2.2.0
> >
> > I noticed, what seened to me, to be odd.  These produce a
> > boxplot in the first case and a spineplot in the second case
> > in R .2.2.0:
> >
> > plot(Sepal.Length ~ Species, iris)
> > plot(Species ~ Sepal.Length, iris)
> >
> > What if one wants to exchange axes?  Does the fact that this
> > seemingly innocuous change result in completely different
> > graphics make sense?  Is it desirable?
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
>