[Rd] is.na<- problem
(Ted Harding)
Ted.Harding at nessie.mcc.ac.uk
Thu Oct 20 02:13:42 CEST 2005
On 19-Oct-05 Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> In the following the first element of xx should have
> been set to 0 but remains NA. Any comments?
>
>> xx <- c(NA,1)
>> is.na(xx) <- 0
>> xx
> [1] NA 1
>> R.version.string # Windows XP
> [1] "R version 2.2.0, 2005-09-20"
I wonder, has it ever worked? I get the same as you on
R.version.string #Linux
[1] "R version 1.6.2, 2003-01-10"
R.version.string #Linux
[1] "R version 1.8.0, 2003-10-08"
R.version.string #Linux
[1] "R version 2.1.0, 2005-04-08"
with the exception of
R.version.string #Linux
[1] "R version 1.2.3, 2001-04-26"
which does know about is.na()<- at all.
Hmmm
Ted.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <Ted.Harding at nessie.mcc.ac.uk>
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 20-Oct-05 Time: 01:11:45
------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------
More information about the R-devel
mailing list