[Rd] nls and weigthing the fit
Joerg van den Hoff
j.van_den_Hoff at fz-rossendorf.de
Wed Nov 23 12:28:33 CET 2005
- Previous message: [Rd] x[1,], x[1,,], x[1,,,], ...
- Next message: [Rd] x[1,], x[1,,], x[1,,,], ...
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
hi everybody,
which each release I hope that the section
"weights: an optional numeric vector of (fixed) weights. When present,
the objective function is weighted least squares. _not yet
implemented_"
in the help page of 'nls' is missing the last sentence.
are their any plans to allow/include weighting in the upcoming releases?
modifying the cost function to include the weights is probably not the
problem, I presume. what is the reason for not including the weighting?
are they related to the 'statistical' output (estimation of parameter
uncertainties and significances?).
I know of the "y ~ M" vs. "~ sqrt(W)*(y-M)" work around suggestion in
MASS to include weighting. (I understand that resulting error estimates
und confidence intervals from 'nls' are wrong in this case. right?)
would'nt it be sensible to inlcude weighting in 'nls' at least on this
level, i.e. weighted parameters provided now, correct error estimates
and the like coming later?
regards,
joerg
- Previous message: [Rd] x[1,], x[1,,], x[1,,,], ...
- Next message: [Rd] x[1,], x[1,,], x[1,,,], ...
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the R-devel
mailing list