[Rd] Rout for library/base/R-ex/Extract.data.frame.R
Paul Gilbert
pgilbert at bank-banque-canada.ca
Wed May 25 16:44:11 CEST 2005
Martin Maechler wrote:
>>>>>>"UweL" == Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.uni-dortmund.de>
>>>>>> on Wed, 25 May 2005 11:08:18 +0200 writes:
>
>
> UweL> Vadim Ogranovich wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am writing a light-weight data frame class and want to
> >> borrow the test cases from the standard data frame. I
> >> found the test cases in
> >> library/base/R-ex/Extract.data.frame.R, but surprisingly
> >> no corresponding .Rout files. In fact there is no *.Rout
> >> file in the entire tarball. Not that I cann't generate
> >> them, but I am just curious why they are not there? How
> >> does the base package get tested?
> >>
> >> Thanks, Vadim
>
> UweL> The base packages have their test cases in ...R/tests
> UweL> rather than ....R/src/library/packagename
>
> yes, and the *examples* from the help pages are just run, and
> not compared to prespecified output in *.Rout.save (sic!) files.
> In an *installed* (not the source!) version of R or an R package
> you find the R code for all the examples from the help pages
> in <pkg>/R-ex/*.R.
> That's the same for all R packages, not just the standard
> packages.
Vadim
I'll expand a bit on Martin's comment. It is hard to test the output of
all examples because some examples use random numbers, and for others
the precision may vary a bit on different platforms. I typically add
important examples to the tests directory, set the random number
generation, and compare results within tolerances that work on different
platforms.
Paul Gilbert
>
> Martin Maechler
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
More information about the R-devel
mailing list