[Rd] unexpected behaviour of expression(sum())
Prof Brian Ripley
ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Sun Mar 13 13:04:49 CET 2005
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk> writes:
>> So my guess on scalable fonts was right.
>> I suspect this is a problem in how the X server is using Type1 fonts,
>> specifically in how it thinks they are encoded. This is why I asked
>> about the locale: \summation is \345 in the Adobe symbol character set
>> and \circleplus is \305 which is a u/case to l/case difference in
> Well, the X server is defenseless against people aliasing fonts with
> incompatible encodings...
That's still surmise.
>> I now recall Kurt had similar problems with gsfonts-x11 last August:
>>>> Kurt has found a problem with the last two pages of demo(plotmath) on
>>>> X11 (some symbols either wrong or missing completely).
>> We found
>>>> the issue seems to be that gsfonts-x11 has aliases
>> "-urw-standard symbols l-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-adobe-fontspecific"
>>>> "-urw-standard symbols l-regular-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-adobe-fontspecific" "-
>> urw-standard symbols l-medium-r-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-adobe-fontspecific"
>>>> Any way to ensure that these fonts are not taken by us?
>>> I don't think so, for if I understand that the alias file is lying about
>>> encodings. We specifically added "-adobe-symbol" to overcome problems with
>>> abi symbol fonts at ETHZ, but if that package says the urw fonts in
>>> `standard symbols l' are in adobe symbol and they are not, you are in
> ...as previously noted, it seems (who are you citing there?).
Kurt and myself (where uncredited).
Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
More information about the R-devel