[Rd] unexpected behaviour of expression(sum())

[Marc Schwartz]

On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 17:17 +0000, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> I see you have both a scalable font (the first) and size-specfic fonts. 
> My guess is that the scalable font is not encoded in the same way as the 
> others: can you track down where it is coming from?
> 
> Otherwise my list on FC3 is the same as yours (minus the duplicates, which 
> are also puzzling).  I have also just checked Exceed, which has the same 
> list plus scalable fonts (and also has
> 
> -adobe-symbol-0-0-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-adobe-fontspecific
> -adobe-symbol-0-0-normal--0-0-0-0-p-0-sun-fontspecific
> -adobe-symbol-0-0-normal--0-0-100-100-p-0-adobe-fontspecific
> -adobe-symbol-0-0-normal--0-0-100-100-p-0-sun-fontspecific
> -adobe-symbol-0-0-normal--0-0-75-75-p-0-adobe-fontspecific
> -adobe-symbol-0-0-normal--0-0-75-75-p-0-sun-fontspecific
> 
> which caused problems for 2.0.1 with getting bold symbols in some sizes, 
> hence the second bug fix I mentioned).
> 
> As a wild guess, do you have a font server as well as local fonts?
> 
> Brian


FWIW, here is my list:

$ xlsfonts | grep adobe-symbol
-adobe-symbol-medium-r-normal--10-100-75-75-p-61-adobe-fontspecific
-adobe-symbol-medium-r-normal--11-80-100-100-p-61-adobe-fontspecific
-adobe-symbol-medium-r-normal--12-120-75-75-p-74-adobe-fontspecific
-adobe-symbol-medium-r-normal--14-100-100-100-p-85-adobe-fontspecific
-adobe-symbol-medium-r-normal--14-140-75-75-p-85-adobe-fontspecific
-adobe-symbol-medium-r-normal--17-120-100-100-p-95-adobe-fontspecific
-adobe-symbol-medium-r-normal--18-180-75-75-p-107-adobe-fontspecific
-adobe-symbol-medium-r-normal--20-140-100-100-p-107-adobe-fontspecific
-adobe-symbol-medium-r-normal--24-240-75-75-p-142-adobe-fontspecific
-adobe-symbol-medium-r-normal--25-180-100-100-p-142-adobe-fontspecific
-adobe-symbol-medium-r-normal--34-240-100-100-p-191-adobe-fontspecific
-adobe-symbol-medium-r-normal--8-80-75-75-p-51-adobe-fontspecific

Deepayan, which X server is being used? FC3 (fully updated) is using
xorg 6.8.1 if that might make a difference. 

Marc