[Rd] Standalone Mathlib, C++ and ISNAN()
tlumley at u.washington.edu
Wed Jan 5 17:09:33 CET 2005
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Bill Northcott wrote:
> If building against a full R library, one might possible use R_IsNaN instead
> but this function is not included in libRmath v2.0 and the function
> R_IsNaNorNA which was used in libRmath v1.9 no longer exists
Yes, but in your standalone C or C++ code you can just use isnan() from
The reason that R doesn't do that is twofold. In the past we tried to
support computers that didn't use IEEE 754 arithmetic, which meant that
isnan might not exist. Also, IIRC we found that isnan() doesn't use 1 for
TRUE on all platforms -- sometimes it uses -1 or something else -- and
code had assumed 1. That's why the strange-looking isnan(x)!=0 is there.
You shouldn't have either of these problems in your C++ code, so it would
be much easier to just use isnan(x) directly. The only complication
would be distinguishing NA from other NaNs, but you won't have to do that
in standalone C++ code.
It would be worth noting somewhere that ISNAN breaks when some C++ headers
are included on Mac OS X, and I will do that.
More information about the R-devel