[Rd] Covergence FLAG in glm (PR#7235)
ligges at statistik.uni-dortmund.de
Sat Sep 18 16:53:38 CEST 2004
daniel.jeske at ucr.edu wrote:
> Full_Name: Daniel R Jeske
> Version: 1.8.1
> OS: Windows 2000
> Submission from: (NULL) (220.127.116.11)
> We have just noticed that when you use glm() it seems the logical
> output 'converged' is always TRUE. The same data set that shows
> FALSE in version 1.7.1 shows TRUE in 1.8.1. And I know that FALSE
> is the correct answer...so it seems like we cannot trust the 'converged'
> flag for glm() in version 1.8.1 ?????
Please try again with a recent alpha version of R-2.0.0 (R-1.8.1 is
If it still happens, please specify a reproducible example and explain
why converged=FALSE is expected.
> R-devel at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
More information about the R-devel