[Rd] binary R for Fedora Core 2 e tcl
MSchwartz at MedAnalytics.com
Tue May 25 18:01:32 CEST 2004
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 10:35, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Marc Schwartz <MSchwartz at medanalytics.com> writes:
> > I think that Martyn's consideration of waiting on a FC2 RPM for R 1.9.1
> > is reasonable, since that would be an official R release with the FC2
> > related fixes. Otherwise, it becomes to an extent, an arbitrary
> > decision as to which R patched tarball to use as the basis for a R
> > 1.9.0.X FC2 RPM. That could complicate support.
> I suppose the right way to do it is to take the official R-1.9.0.tgz
> and put the relevant patch set in the spec file. Wouldn't worry too
> much about support since Martyn's version is effectively the official
> one. However, with 1.9.1 less than a month into the future, there's
> not much point in messing with it now.
True on all accounts.
More information about the R-devel