[Rd] make check failed for R-1.9.0alpha (2004-03-16) when link against Goto's BLAS

[Peter Dalgaard]

"Liaw, Andy" <andy_liaw at merck.com> writes:

> Dear all,
> 
> Has anyone seen the same problem?  I tried compiling R-1.9.0 alpha
> (2004-03-16) on our Opteron box running SUSE Linux ES8.  I ran:
> 
> ./configure --enable-R-shlib --with-blas=goto
> 
> and got:
> 
>   Source directory:          .
>   Installation directory:    /usr/local
> 
>   C compiler:                gcc  -m64 -O2 -g -msse2 -march=k8 -Wall
> --pedantic
>   C++ compiler:              g++  -m64 -O2 -g -msse2 -march=k8 -Wall
> --pedantic
>   Fortran compiler:          g77  -m64 -O2 -g -msse2 -march=k8
> 
>   Interfaces supported:      X11, tcltk
>   External libraries:        readline, BLAS(generic)
>   Additional capabilities:   PNG, JPEG
>   Options enabled:           shared library, R profiling
> 
>   Recommended packages:      yes
> 
> (The Goto BLAS is libgoto_opt64-r0.93.so.)
> 
> "make" ran fine, but "make check" failed with tail
> tests/Examples/stats-Ex.Rout.fail giving:
> 
> > ## now see the effect of the explanatory variables
> > data(Seatbelts)
> > X <- Seatbelts[, c("kms", "PetrolPrice", "law")]
> > X[, 1] <- log10(X[, 1]) - 4
> > arima(log10(Seatbelts[, "drivers"]), c(1,0,0),
> +       seasonal = list(order= c(1,0,0)), xreg = X)
> Error in La.svd(x, nu, nv, method) : error code 3 from Lapack routine dgesdd
> Execution halted
> 
> If I do "make clean" and re-configure without the Goto BLAS, then it passes
> make check.  Does anyone know what I'm doing wrong?  Any help much
> appreciated!

Odd... I'm (seemingly) passing make check with 

pd at linux:~/r-devel/BUILD-GOTO> ldd bin/R.bin
        libgoto_opt64p-r0.93.so => not found
        libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x0000002a9566d000)
        libg2c.so.0 => /usr/lib64/libg2c.so.0 (0x0000002a95801000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x0000002a95923000)
        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x0000002a95a7d000)
        libreadline.so.4 => /lib64/libreadline.so.4
        (0x0000002a95b88000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x0000002a95cc2000)
        libncurses.so.5 => /lib64/libncurses.so.5 (0x0000002a95dc5000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000002a95f26000)
        /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 => /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
        (0x0000002a95556000)

(on SuSE 9) The only obvious difference is that I'm using the threaded
version of the BLAS. It is of course possible that some last-digit
difference is sending arima() out on a different branch for you.

-- 
   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Blegdamsvej 3  
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     2200 Cph. N   
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark      Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk)             FAX: (+45) 35327907