[Rd] tapply/barplot (PR#6983)
Peter Dalgaard
p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk
Tue Jun 15 14:26:18 CEST 2004
Vidar.Hjellvik at imr.no writes:
> Hello,
>
> there seems to be a bug in tapply or barplot in R 1.9.0 that was not in =
> earlier versions. The following code creates two nice barplots in 1.7.0, =
> but the first one is bad in 1.9.0:
>
> par(mfrow=3Dc(1,2))
> x <- rep(1:10,10)
> y <- runif(100,1,100)
> z <- tapply(y,x,mean)
> barplot(z)
> barplot(as.numeric(z))
We know. Please check the relevant sources for previous reports, and,
in particular at this stage, the current 1.9.1beta!
>
> although is.numeric(z) returns TRUE!
That's irrelevant: as.numeric does more than convert to numeric. Try
this for instance:
m <- matrix(1:6,2)
barplot(m)
barplot(as.numeric(m))
--
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
More information about the R-devel
mailing list