[Rd] a fault in the "hist" - function (PR#6931)
p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk
Wed Jun 2 16:09:50 CEST 2004
ligges at statistik.uni-dortmund.de writes:
> The problem is in hist.default():
> diddle <- 1e-7 * max(abs(range(breaks)))
> and whereever we are diddling - there are some disadvantages.
> Do we want a flag that turns off diddling and the following "fuzz"
> stuff? Or do we want something to adjust the hardcoded heuristical value
> "1e-7" (to zero, for example)?
Neither, I think, since the diddle is there for a reason, and the only
real problem is the use of breaks that are wildly off-scale. We might
key diddle to xlim instead, or possibly let "diddle" be an argument
with a suitable default.
You probably can't get all cases completely right though. A tiny range
of numbers (compared to the mean) is likely to cause problems whatever
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
More information about the R-devel