[Rd] Reorganization of packages in the R distribution

Peter Dalgaard p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk
Sat Dec 13 11:42:36 MET 2003


Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk> writes:

> > On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Paul Gilbert wrote:
> > 
> > > If  I understand this change correctly, I think is wrong for R-core to 
> > > think it is a small change. It has much more serious consequences for me 
> > > than any changes introduced  R 1.0. It definitely should not be 
> > > introduced at a dot level release unless there is a fairly simple 
> > > mechanism to deal with the implications. It breaks  6 of my 9 packages 
> > > on CRAN at a fairly fundamental level,  2 more at a less serious level,  
> > > and some packages I have not yet release.
> 
> But there is a lack of independence: it breaks no other package on CRAN 
> (all the other breakages are looking explicitly in what are now wrong 
> places, in some cases calling C-level entry points which are not in the 
> API).

Just to add, re. development: The intention is 1.9.x == pre-2.0.0, so
the timing of a major restructuring is precisely right if we want as
solid a 2.0 series as possible.


-- 
   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Blegdamsvej 3  
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     2200 Cph. N   
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark      Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk)             FAX: (+45) 35327907



More information about the R-devel mailing list