[Rd] Reorganization of packages in the R distribution
Peter Dalgaard
p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk
Sat Dec 13 11:42:36 MET 2003
Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk> writes:
> > On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Paul Gilbert wrote:
> >
> > > If I understand this change correctly, I think is wrong for R-core to
> > > think it is a small change. It has much more serious consequences for me
> > > than any changes introduced R 1.0. It definitely should not be
> > > introduced at a dot level release unless there is a fairly simple
> > > mechanism to deal with the implications. It breaks 6 of my 9 packages
> > > on CRAN at a fairly fundamental level, 2 more at a less serious level,
> > > and some packages I have not yet release.
>
> But there is a lack of independence: it breaks no other package on CRAN
> (all the other breakages are looking explicitly in what are now wrong
> places, in some cases calling C-level entry points which are not in the
> API).
Just to add, re. development: The intention is 1.9.x == pre-2.0.0, so
the timing of a major restructuring is precisely right if we want as
solid a 2.0 series as possible.
--
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
More information about the R-devel
mailing list