behavior of =
Fri, 08 Nov 2002 10:05:56 -0700
At 08:41 AM 11/8/2002 -0800, A.J. Rossini wrote:
>The "<-" assignment operator is beautiful. It's taken me over a
>decade, but I have come to appreciate it. It isn't common, and there
>are fewer and fewer ex-APL'ers, but I think it's a great choice.
>The use of "=" for named arguments in a function call signature makes
>sense, and the use of "==" for equality makes sense.
>But syntactical sugar should only be messed with if broken (and yes,
>this may be one of the few points that I'd disagree with John; I wish
>he'd never introduced "=" as a possible assignment).
Yup, the S-language does have 3 separate symbols available for 3 separate
functions ("=" for named arguments, "<-" for assignment, and "==" for
equality). Like Tony Rossini, I'd rather that these did not
overlap. Would it be possible to give parse() (and source()) an argument,
or allow a pragma in a file, that would disallow the use of "=" for
assignment? (Since "=" was introduced as an assignment operator in S
implementations, I've been bitten by the bug of a "="/"==" typo a couple of
times, and have never seen any benefit from the change.)
-- Tony Plate
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: firstname.lastname@example.org