[Rd] maketitle.pl for Perl 4.004

[Kurt Hornik]

>>>>> Peter Kleiweg writes:

> Kurt Hornik scribeva...
>> > In either case, you probably want to upgrade. Even 5.005 is "old",
>> > so the upgrade to 5.6.1 is probably advisable.
>> 
>> Correct.  R 1.6 will unconditionally assume 5.005.

> I am sorry to hear that.

>> >> 1.4.1 instead. Can I expect this to cause any problems, for
>> >> instance when I build a package?
>> 
>> > Possibly, though probably only Kurt et al could say for sure.
>> 
>> As Fritz said: yes, but I'd recommend upgrading Perl to 5.005 or even
>> 5.6.1.

> Unfortunately, that is not an option at the moment. I guess most
> people working with R are professionals with the means to work
> with relative new hardware. I have to make do with a very old
> system, a disk drive that is almost full, so no possibility to
> compile a recent version of gcc, or upgrade anything that
> demands a C compiler that is not from last century.

> I write quite some software myself. Working with an old system
> like I have has the advantage that I never hear people complain
> that my software doesn't work on their system because there
> system is too old.

Following the same reasoning, wouldn't one always stay with R 0.14 or
similar?  Note that e.g. requiring Perl 5.005 only has implications for
*developers* and not for users because we have no dependency on Perl at
run-time.  And the hope would be that developers have access to software
which is 4 years old and typically available in pre-packaged binaries.

-k
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._