[Rd] 1st January isn't (PR#1370)
Prof Brian D Ripley
ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Sat, 9 Mar 2002 08:43:24 +0000 (GMT)
On 9 Mar 2002, Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote:
> tlumley@u.washington.edu writes:
>
> > In today's pre1.5.0
> >
> > > ISOdate(2002,1,1)
> > [1] "2002-03-01 04:00:00 PST"
> >
> > > ISOdate(2002,1,1)==ISOdate(2002,3,1)
> > [1] TRUE
> >
> > It doesn't seem to happen for days other than 1/1
> >
> > -thomas
>
> Confirmed. I don't see how it could have happened from anything
> other than this change
>
> diff -u -r1.16 -r1.17
> --- src/main/datetime.c 31 Oct 2001 13:35:39 -0000 1.16
> +++ src/main/datetime.c 6 Mar 2002 11:27:37 -0000 1.17
> @@ -674,6 +674,10 @@
> !strptime(CHAR(STRING_ELT(x, i%n)),
> CHAR(STRING_ELT(sformat, i%m)), &tm);
> if(!invalid) {
> + /* Solaris sets missing fields to 0: but that's a valid year */
> + if(tm.tm_mday == 0) tm.tm_mday = NA_INTEGER;
> + if(tm.tm_yday == 0) tm.tm_yday = NA_INTEGER;
> + if(tm.tm_mon == 0) tm.tm_mon = NA_INTEGER;
> if(tm.tm_mon == NA_INTEGER || tm.tm_mday == NA_INTEGER
> || tm.tm_year == NA_INTEGER)
> glibc_fix(&tm, &invalid);
>
> I don't see how that could cause it either, though....
It can. Unfortunately the Solaris man page is incorrect. mon runs from 0
to 11, hence the fix is incorrect.
Fixed again.
--
Brian D. Ripley, ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272860 (secr)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._