(PR#1715) Re: package `methods' has persistent effects even if
detached
Martin Maechler
Martin Maechler <maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch>
Fri, 28 Jun 2002 11:58:10 +0200
>>>>> "KH" == Kurt Hornik <hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at> writes:
>>>>> Prof Brian D Ripley writes:
>> Sorry, forgot to say this is in R-devel (2002-06-27) but not in 1.5.1.
>>> class
>> .Primitive("class")
>>> find("class")
>> [1] "package:base"
>>> library(methods)
>>> class
>> .Primitive("dataClass")
>>> find("class")
>> [1] "package:methods" "package:base"
>>> get("class", "package:base")
>> .Primitive("dataClass")
>>> detach("package:methods")
>>> class
>> .Primitive("dataClass")
>> so attaching methods is altering the class object *in base*.
>> Related to namespaces?
KH> A problem in library(), maybe?
KH> All I see is
KH> R/class.R:class <- dataClass
KH> but surely assignments should be in methods and not in base?
I think JMC mentioned something about the reasons for this,
and will again (?) when `morning has broken' at the East cost
(and Luke can chime in a bit later ... when the sun touches Midwest.. :-)
My guess is: This is *necessary* now that base is a namespaced,
since everything in base is using class() as defined in base!
{use it's own name space first!}.
Martin
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._