[Rd] RFC: d/p/q/rgamma

[Thomas Lumley]

On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:

> BTW, I think the cleanest approach is
>
> dgamma(x, shape, rate = 1, scale = 1/rate, log = FALSE)
>
Yes, I think this is better

	-thomas


-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._