[Rd] R-1.2.3: a small suggestion (PR#961)

A.J. Rossini rossini@u.washington.edu
31 May 2001 09:52:54 -0700


>>>>> "r" == ripley  <ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk> writes:

    r> There is a serious problem with that. All the user-installed
    r> packages in /usr/local/lib/R-1.2.3/library disappear from view
    r> on upgrade.  They would need to be migrated.

One thought would be to emulate XEmacs in this regard -- lisp packages
are in equivalent of /usr/local/lib/R, while version-specific code is
in the equivalent of /usr/local/lib/R-version.

best,
-tony

-- 
A.J. Rossini				Rsrch. Asst. Prof. of Biostatistics
U. of Washington Biostatistics		rossini@u.washington.edu	
FHCRC/SCHARP/HIV Vaccine Trials Net	rossini@scharp.org
-------- (wednesday/friday is unknown) --------
FHCRC: M-Tu : 206-667-7025 (fax=4812)|Voicemail is pretty sketchy/use Email
UW:    Th   : 206-543-1044 (fax=3286)|Change last 4 digits of phone to FAX

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._