[Rd] RE: [R] Removing "row.names"

Kurt Hornik Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at
Wed, 7 Feb 2001 18:23:12 +0100


>>>>> Thomas Lumley writes:

> On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Kurt Hornik wrote:
>> >>>>> Peter Dalgaard BSA writes:
>> 
>> > Kurt Hornik <Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at> writes:
>> >> names(sampled) <- " "
>> >> and
>> >> dimnames(sampled)[[2]] <- " "
>> >> 
>> >> happily introduce non-unique variable names in the data frame.
>> >> 
>> >> Is the rule that row.names and names must be unique still on?
>> >> 
>> >> Argh ...
>> 
>> > Splus 3.4 dispatches on dimnames<-, but not on names<- with the
>> > following curious result:
>> 
>> >> d <- data.frame(a=1:3,b=4:6)
>> >> names(d)<-c(" "," ")
>> >> d
>> 
>> > 1 1 4
>> > 2 2 5
>> > 3 3 6
>> >> dimnames(d)[[1]] <- rep(" ",3)  
>> > Error in "dimnames<-.data.frame"(d, .A0): column names must be unique
>> > Dumped
>> 
>> > R dispatches similarly, but doesn't check the dimnames in
>> > dimnames<-.data.frame. It could do so quite easily. Just add 
>> 
>> > || any(duplicated(d[[1]])) || any(duplicated(d[[2]]))
>> 
>> > at the appropriate spot.
>> 
>> Thomas' view about what should be permitted seems to be different.

> I wouldn't object to making it hard to create duplicated names(), but
> I think it would be a bad idea to have data.frame() make up unique
> names if it's given non-unique ones.

Maybe `check.names' could also be used for uniqueness testing?

In any case, I think we should specify what *exactly* a data frame is.

-k
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._