tabulate

[Bill Venables]

> Dear R-Developers,
> 
> Would it be possible / is it desirable to alter tabulate 
> so that the lower boundary
> can be set in addition to the upper boundary? eg,
> 
> tabulate(bin, low=min(1,bin), nbin=max(1,bin))
> 
> would silently ignore elements outside the range low..nbin
> 
> It is easy to get around this at present, of course,
> but seems natural to have a more flexible function. 
> [or should I be using another function?]

I would oppose it on the grounds that tabulate() is a low-level
function and making a change like this is likely to slow it down
(if marginally) and to hinder porting software from R to S, which
I regard as an important consideration, if not an over-riding one.

table() should be the usual function for everyday use (and using
this makes the change to tabulate() unnecessary), but on R the
difference in speed between table() and tabulate() can be
dramatic.  I would suggest improving the efficiency of table()
should be a fairly high priority.

Bill.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Venables, Statistician, CMIS Environmetrics Project.

Physical address:                            Postal address:
CSIRO Marine Laboratories,                   PO Box 120,       
233 Middle St, Cleveland, Qld, 4163          Cleveland, Qld, 4163
AUSTRALIA                                    AUSTRALIA

Tel: +61 7 3826 7251           Email: Bill.Venables@cmis.csiro.au     
Fax: +61 7 3826 7304      http://www.cmis.csiro.au/bill.venables/
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._