RNG initialization

[Prof Brian Ripley]

> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 10:26:26 -0500
> From: Paul Gilbert <pgilbert@bank-banque-canada.ca>
> 
> >Since set.seed seems a suitable name and it would help compatibility,
> >would
> >set.seed(seed, kind = 0)
> >be a suitable interface?  Or would people prefer
> >RNGinit(kind, seed)
> 
> Before making too many changes to random number generation it might be useful 
to
> look at the code below which is part of my syskern package. It sets the seed,

As I understand it, that does not do what either S-PLUS's set.seed does
or what Ben asks for, as the seed has to be of a length and values
appropriate to the RNGkind.  The request was to use a single value:
otherwise why not just assign to .Random.seed?  

Personally I do not like the altering of system functions in user
packages, as what happens if two or more people do it? It depends
on the load order.


-- 
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272860 (secr)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._