[Rd] row.names, rownames; colnames, no col.names?

[A.J. Rossini]

There's a bit of a symmetry issue, which may or may not be important
(led to 15 seconds of confusion until I got my bearings straight): 

row.names, rownames; colnames, no col.names? 

I _NOW_ realize the difference between row.names and rownames, but
is there any reason not to have col.names for re-naming columns in a
data.frame? 

(if there is, I don't particular need to know it, but it might make a
nice FAQ).

best,
-tony


-- 
A.J. Rossini				Rsrch. Asst. Prof. of Biostatistics
BlindGlobe Networks (home/default)	rossini@blindglobe.net	
UW Biostat/Center for AIDS Research	rossini@u.washington.edu	
FHCRC/SCHARP/HIV Vaccine Trials Net	rossini@scharp.org

FHCRC: M/Tu: 206-667-7025 (fax=4812) | Voicemail is pretty sketchy
CFAR:   W/F: 206-731-3647 (fax=3694) | Email is far better than phone
UW:    Th/F: 206-543-1044 (fax=3286) | Change last 4 digits of phone for fax
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._