[Rd] Writing lgrindefs

[Kjetil Kjernsmo]

On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Uwe Ligges wrote:

>Suggestions:
>1)
>Another way is to write a R function, that generates "nice" TeX code.
>Or a R function, that generates code to be interpreted by a TeX macro.
>Such a function would know about loaded packages and their functions,
>user specific functions, other objects in the users environment (as
>needed).
>
>2)
>Providing names of functions of the most used packages (e.g. base,
>ctest, ts, ...) would be enough, if the user could easily extend the
>list of "known" functions (or other objects).
>I think about a TeX command (defined in your macro), that could be used
>as follows:
> \addrfunctionnames{myfunc1, myfunc2, myfunc3}

Both your suggestions are interesting, and should receive some attention I
guess. The good thing about lgrind is that it is in fairly common use, and
that definitions for many languages allready exist. When the time of
generating LaTeX code for my thesis approaches, I think I'll try to find a
newsgroup and ask about a few details.

Best,

Kjetil
-- 
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Graduate astronomy-student                    Problems worthy of attack
University of Oslo, Norway            Prove their worth by hitting back
E-mail: kjetikj@astro.uio.no                                - Piet Hein
Homepage <URL:http://www.astro.uio.no/~kjetikj/>
Webmaster@skepsis.no 

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._