nlm docs (PR#146)
Martin Maechler
Martin Maechler <maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch>
Thu, 25 Mar 1999 14:48:56 +0100
>>>>> "PD" == Peter Dalgaard BSA <p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk> writes:
PD> plindsey@alpha.luc.ac.be writes:
>> In R.63.3, in the docs for nlm the section on code is messed up.
>> (apparently there is a problem in the commands in the Rd-file)
>> Patrick.
PD> Thanks. This is the kind of documentation bug that so easily goes
PD> unreported. Keep 'em coming.
Yes, indeed!
---
The above bug is actually not a problem in
src/library/base/man/nlm.Rd
but in the code in
etc/Rdconvlib.pl
The construct
\describe{
\item{1:}{bla bla}
\item{2:}{blech blech}
}
is well translated to both LaTeX and HTML,
but not to NROFF (basis for ASCII).
===> Any help from "Roff" knowledgables ????
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._