time series in R

[Prof Brian D Ripley]

On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Ross Ihaka wrote:

> On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Prof Brian D Ripley wrote:
> 
> > >     3.	On the definition question: The existing FFT implementation
> > > 	uses a particular definition for the discrete transform which
> > > 	is pretty standard.  (Edwards "Fourier Series", Brillinger
> > > 	"Time Series" etc.) Using another definition may complicate
> > > 	documentation.
> > 
> > That's the simple part.  But what is the divisor in the periodogram? Which
> > way do lags go in acfs of bivariate series, and which sign is the phase for
> > bivariate spectra?
> 
> Once you settle the forward discrete transform much of this is settled.

Isn't that the tail wagging the dog?

> No constant in the dft implies
> 	Periodogram = |dft|^2/(2*pi*T)

Why is the 2*pi there? It is in Bloomfield, but not Brockwell & Davis, for
example. And S-PLUS divides by the fequency to make the periodogram
estimate the spectral density.

> Phases in spectra also fall out if you take a +ve exponent in the dft.
>
But you have to decide which of series i and j gets the complex conjugate.
(Same issue with acfs: second relative to first or first relative to
second?  It's like defining `lags'.)

> I don't much mind about these choices, but its probably a good idea to
> be consistent.

Consistent with whom?

-- 
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272860 (secr)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._