ts and defaults

[Paul Gilbert]

>The plan is to separate the the default methods from the
>ts class methods.  We do not consider that S compatibility applies
>to class ts, which S does not have.

The other part of the problem is that the function name ts() has already been
appropriated as the constructor for the default, so you can't use ts() as the
constructor for your "ts" class. Ditto for is.ts, as.ts, etc.

Paul

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._