cbind is not generic as claimed, omits labels where S has them (PR#239)

ihaka@stat.auckland.ac.nz ihaka@stat.auckland.ac.nz
Fri, 6 Aug 1999 04:54:27 +0200 (MET DST)


On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 12:08:05AM +0200, Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote:
> Ross Ihaka <ihaka@stat.auckland.ac.nz> writes:
> 
> I played around with this earlier today. There's nothing special about
> dataframes, S does the same with any classed object. I.e.
> 
> class(b)<-"my"
> cbind.my<-function(...)match.call()
> 
> cbind(a,b)
> 
> will dispatch cbind.my

I played some more.  I think data frames are special somehow.

	S> x <- factor(1:10)
	S> y <- data.frame(1:10)
	> class(x)
	[1] "factor"
	S> class(y)
	[1] "data.frame"
	S> class(cbind(x,y))
	[1] "data.frame"
	S> class(cbind(y,x))
	[1] "data.frame"

They seem to overpower other class arguments too.

	Ross


-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._