pretty(.) bug -- fix --> "compatibility" ?
Peter Dalgaard BSA
04 Mar 1998 16:36:26 +0100
Martin Maechler <email@example.com> writes:
> Is it okay for you if we do NOT strive for S-plus compatibility here?
> Strict S-plus compatibility is not possible, since we don't have S-plus
> code; but it is also not desirable in the cases where S's pretty() is
> However, with more experiments and thought, it ought to be possible
> to come quite close to S's behavior.
> But I don't want to spend that extra time if there are no stringent
We have a lot of these little differences. No reason to waste time on
them, unless we get actual complaints, I'd say.
(Here's a couple of additions to the list of differences:
aovtable <- anova(KW.lm)$table
Statistic <- aovtable["group","Sum Sq"]
s <- summary(KW.lm)
Statistic <- s$coefficients["group","t Value"] *
[anova returns a table, rather than a list containing a table, in S and
uses "Sum of Sq" and "t value"])
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (firstname.lastname@example.org) FAX: (+45) 35327907
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: email@example.com