pow_ii

[Kurt Hornik]

>>>>> Peter Dalgaard BSA writes:

> Martin Maechler <maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch> writes:
PaulG> nm -u dsefor.so
PaulG> Undefined symbols from dsefor.so:
PaulG> .umul
PaulG> pow_dd
PaulG> pow_ii
PaulG> pow_ri
>> 
>> Well, I don't know myself.
> ...
>> Ross plans to change and cleanup the R setup such
>> that either Fortran or f2c  will be required in a future release anyway.

> Are we already requiring the libs? I forget. If we do, isn't it just a
> matter of adding them in when the .so file is linked?

No, we're not.  In the current stage, we don't require a FORTRAN
compiler or f2c.  What you can (should) do now is to add "-lf2c" to the
.so rule in src-c/Makefile and hope that everyone has libf2c.  This will
of course mean that those who have a ``plain C only'' environment (no
FORTRAN compiler, no f2c) will not be able to install the package.  But
then again, in the near future they won't be able to compiler R anyway.

-k
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._